y39彩票攻略|在线用户注册平台 | 官网APP下载

来源：y39彩票注册网2024-01-18 17:48

新华全媒+|湖南：村医上门服务让农村防疫有“医”靠******url:https://m.gmw.cn/2023-01/12/content_1303252486.htm,id:1303252486

　　新华社长沙1月11日电（记者余春生、帅才、陈思汗）农村是疫情防控和医疗服务保障的重点地区。近期，湖南3.7万余名村医成了服务农村新冠病毒感染患者的“排头兵”，他们通过电话问询、上门随访等方式，为群众就医用药提供“一站式”服务。

新华全媒+|湖南：村医上门服务让农村防疫有“医”靠

　　1月5日，在湖南省长沙市长沙县江背镇福田村，医护人员为居家老人听诊。新华社记者陈思汗摄

　　“余医生，我发烧头疼，还咳嗽，你能过来看看吗？”近日，韶山市银田镇银田村卫生室医生余瑜接到了村民苏少华打来的电话。

　　苏少华今年70岁，患有高血压等基础性疾病。余瑜问清症状后，准备好药物，赶到老人家里，给老人测量体温、血压，监测心率。针对老人的症状，余瑜给老人开了退烧药等药物，并叮嘱老人相关的注意事项。

　　近期，韶山市发挥乡村家庭医生“基层首诊、保健康、防重症”的作用，组建“三级网格化”家庭医生团队37支，将基层医疗机构和医共体专家共148人纳入团队管理，并将家庭医生的联系方式向群众公布，随时为群众提供治疗方案、用药指导等服务。

新华全媒+|湖南：村医上门服务让农村防疫有“医”靠

　　1月5日，在湖南省长沙市长沙县江背镇砖田新村，医护人员为居家老人送药。新华社记者陈思汗摄

　　最近，在怀化市沅陵县七甲坪镇扶桑村卫生室里，每天一大早，村医全承顺就开始熬制中药汤剂，做成中药包免费发放给有需要的村民。

　　“村里65岁及以上的老人有100多人，大多患有基础疾病，给他们发放一些中药汤剂提高免疫力。”全承顺说，送药过程中，他还会对村里的老人开展巡诊，了解老人是否有发烧等症状。“目前村卫生室退烧药等药物储备比较充足，如果发现相关症状，我们先会给老人对症用药，并持续进行健康监测。”

　　除了为村民提供上门送医送药服务外，湖南各地的村医也是对农村重点人群开展健康摸排的重要力量之一。

　　据了解，为加强对农村地区重点人群的健康服务，从2022年12月开始，湖南省岳阳市、怀化市等地对65岁及以上老年人合并基础疾病患者开展调查，并为其建立健康台账。

　　“村医熟悉村民的情况，配合相关部门对重点人群建立健康档案，定期开展巡诊服务，能够更好守护村民的生命安全和身体健康。”全承顺说。

y39彩票攻略

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.